MIM versus PM
The question of when MIM represents a viable option compared to the traditional powder metal technology is a complex one, but there are a number of factors that can be taken into account.
Volume - Complexity
As illustrated on the graph, there must be a certain volume of components and a certain degree of complexity before it is relevant to choose the MIM technology ahead of the PM (powder metal) technology. Tool costs will be higher for MIM than PM, but in solutions in which two or more subcomponents can be replaced by a single MIM component, the higher tool costs will often be offset by savings in terms of materials, design, assembly and – not least – logistics.
Even better suited to the MIM technology are solutions which involve functions or areas that are not fulfilled today, but which can be enhanced with the MIM technology. MIM can, for example, be used to produce new design details that optimise the solution. At Sintex we have an example with a microscopic "hole" for pressure measurements or several examples with components that include batch number and logo. There are a huge number of possibilities.
Increased strength may also be a requirement. The MIM process is ideal for components produced in plastic where greater strength is required. These components can now be produced in metal with the same degree of complexity.
We recommend that you contact our specialists in the MIM area if you wish to have an evaluation of components and actual projects. The MIM technology is a complex area.